“Why is it that photographers loaded with the most extraordinary gear who use the internet to get the exact GPS coordinates of Jack’s or Ansel’s photo locations and hike out there with the image in hand to ensure an exact copy (illegal by US copyright laws and common decency), that they get something that might look similar, but lacks all the impact and emotion of the original they thought they copied?
I’m not kidding. A bunch of these turkeys used university astronomers to predict the one time in almost two decades that the conditions would match and had 300 of the clueless converge at just the right spot. They still didn’t get the clouds, snow or shadows right. This makes Ansel or any other creative artist cringe. Of course they didn’t get anything like what they wanted. Art is a lot more.
Compelling photographs come from inspiration, not duplication.
Someone asked ‘If I got a camera with only 6 or 7 MP, can I make good pictures with it?’
That reminds me about the guy who breaks a wrist and asks his doctor: ‘Doctor, will I be able to play the piano after this heals?’ The doctor replies ‘Absolutely, no problem!’ The man laughs, and points out that that’s great, because he never could play the piano before!
Buying a Bösendorfer doesn’t mean you can play the piano. Buying a great camera doesn’t mean you can create compelling photographs. Good pianists can play on anything and a good photographer can make great images with a disposable camera.”
– Ken Rockwell, Good pianists can play on anything